Postponed to 2021

Here below is the text of the email sent out to all SRN2020 Delegates and SRN Members on 17 March 2020. Please read carefully and take note of all relevant information.

Scroll down to the bottom of this page for information about refunds.


“Dear SRN Members and SRN2020 Delegates

I hope this finds you well despite everything that is going on.

I am aware that you were awaiting this with some understandable trepidation, and given that there is no way of sugar-coating this, I’ll cut straight to the chase.

Here’s the tagline version:

SRN2020 WILL BE POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER 2021

And here are the (rather) lengthier, but important details.

Yesterday the Executive Council of the SRN discussed as a matter of urgency the current emergency caused by the COVID-19 outbreak. After careful evaluation of all possible scenarios, data and information available thus far, the EC has come to the conclusion that running SRN2020 in September 2020 as per plan is no longer a viable and safe option. Under no circumstance, even assuming the most optimistic outcome in the shortest period of time, we will put the safety and wellbeing of our members/colleagues/friends at risk; at the moment and for the foreseeable future, there is no way of guaranteeing that if we were to still run the conference next September.

The situation so far shows that:

  • All 35 countries the SRN2020 delegates come from have been affected, some in a very significant way;
  • Around 20 have now closed borders and/or banned flights from some/all countries, and this number is increasing daily;
  • Almost all 35 countries have introduced some form of lockdown, plus quarantining for incoming visitors, and self-isolation;
  • Universities from almost all 35 countries have suspended all travel abroad until at least end of April or indefinitely;
  • Insurances (both via university or private) are not guaranteeing cover anymore or refusing flat out at the moment;
  • According to most reliable data (which I have narrowed down to the WHO and the CSSE at Johns Hopkins University), the peak is yet to come in most countries and is to be expected between now and the early Summer, depending on the country. Other projections seem to indicate a risk in some countries (including the UK) for the outbreak to last until or have a double peak into the Autumn, or to subside by the Summer to then come back in the Winter;
  • Adding to that, the official position of UK authorities so far has caused no little extra uncertainty and the situation is still escalating pretty much everywhere.

In light of the above, the EC has considered other options but none seemed viable or offer any certainty.

Postponing to a closer date would only be possible by moving the Oxford dates to January 2021, but this would most certainly have a rather negative impact on the Vienna conference and delegates would still have to start making plans in the middle of the crisis; furthermore, should the more negative projections prove true, we would still have to cancel or postpone again with even less time to do so.

We also considered whether we could save SRN2020 by the bell by turning it into a virtual conference and still run it this year, but the resources, time and infrastructure will simply not be there.

Most colleagues and universities all over the world (including Oxford Brookes) will spend the next few months having to deal with very serious circumstances and work hard at all sorts of backup plans, with added pressure on already heavy workloads, and with all the resources available prioritized to this purpose.

The good news is that all colleagues who were set to organize the Annual Conference in the 2021-23 cycle came to my help and generously agreed to push their events forward by one year in order to free up 2021 for Oxford. I therefore wish to express my deep gratitude to (in chronological order) Claus Tieber, Rosanne Welch, and Rafael Leal. I owe you. This means, to sum up, that our conference agenda for the forthcoming years will be:

  • September 2020 – No International conference (local conferences might still happen later in the year but will be discussed in their respective fora)
  • September 2021 – Oxford (possible dates: either 1-4 or, more likely, 8-11 September)
  • Early October 2022 – Vienna
  • 2023 – Missouri, US
  • 2024 – Rio de Janeiro 

I also want to thank everyone for their patience and understanding, and for the many supportive messages and emails received in the past few days.

SO, WHAT NEXT?

  • As of today, registration, on-campus accommodation booking and dinner booking are suspended
  • Delegates who have already registered or booked their on-campus accommodation via Brookes’s online facilities will be reimbursed – I will send out instructions and contact details soon
  • The conference theme (i.e. Pushing Boundaries) will remain the same – and, perhaps, now more than ever sounds appropriate
  • Delegates already shortlisted for this year’s original dates are automatically confirmed but will have to confirm their intention to attend in 2021; should any delegates decline for whatever reason, a new CfP will be issued later in the year and we will accept new submissions accordingly to add to the current shortlist
  • Delegates who qualified for the student rate this year will be automatically considered eligible next year too, regardless of whether their status will have changed by then
  • Keynotes will be re-invited with the awareness that they might not be able to confirm availability until nearer the new date next year
  • The SRN Awards 2020 will be pushed to 2021, and will therefore cover a two-year time period with submissions extended until May 2021
  • The website will be updated in the forthcoming days and will remain available at all times

New deadlines will be set up for all stages of the lead-up to the Conference but I will have to rework and restart the whole planning machine all over again and this will surely take some time. My hope is to get everything geared up by the Summer so as to give everyone plenty of time to adjust their plans. So, please bear with me until then. I will be in touch every now and then anyway.

In the meantime, if you have queries or need any further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me either at info@srn2020.com or paolo.russo@brookes.ac.uk and I will do my best to help.

Finally, without a conference being held this year, it means that we don’t know yet whether the AGM (and therefore the EC elections) may take place [SEE BELOW]. The EC will discuss this next month and we will inform all Members once a decision has been made on this matter. One tough bite to swallow at a time!

So… I have managed to draft all this without a hint of irony and it’s been as tough as I had imagined it last night. Apologies for the unusually sombre tone of this announcement but given this is an unprecedented situation for everyone, clarity is paramount. You will allow me one last remark: for all the thinking, planning and energy I have been putting into this in the past few months, this is the one email I never thought I would have to send out.

May all of you be well and safe!

Take care

SRN2020 Organizing Committee
Paolo Russo


Refunds

REGISTRATION FEES – If you have already paid your registration fee for September 2020, please request a refund in writing by contacting our Finance Officer Stephen Omwony via email (somwony@brookes.ac.uk) quoting your OBU number, which is the unique number that was automatically generated when you registered and made the payment online.

ON-CAMPUS ACCOMMODATION – If you have booked a room in our Student Village, our Venues team will be contacting you as soon as possible with the relevant instructions. If you have any queries, you can address them to venues@brookes.ac.uk.

As you can imagine, all departments at the university are dealing with the current emergency and are flooded with an incredible high volume of demands. However, rest assured that your requests will be dealt with as soon as possible. Do get in touch with us if you need any further clarification or help.


CALL TO MEMBERSHIP

28 May 2020

RESOLUTION RE:

2020 AGM AND ELECTION OF EXECUTIVE COUNCIL

(ACTION REQUIRED)

This Call to Membership (CTM) and Resolution is posted to all SRN Members via the SRN mailing list and is available on the SRN Website and on the SRN2020 Conference website as well. It aims to consult and call all Members to take action by expressing their preference for one of two options re: this year’s AGM and related EC elections.

  1. Both AGM and elections to be delayed to September 2021 + Mandate of current EC members extended automatically by one year; or
  2. AGM (only) delayed to September 2021 + “virtual” EC elections to be held in September 2020

Members are invited to read the full details below and to cast their preference by clicking HERE by no later than Thursday 19 June, 3 pm (UK time).

The CTM follows on from the announcement issued on 17 March re: the postponement of the SRN2020 Annual Conference and Awards due to the COVID-19 crisis. It outlines the legalities of the pending situation and reports about the decision/recommendation reached by the Executive Council re: this year’s AGM and related EC elections, which has been the most substantial item of discussion in the April and May meetings. You can find full details of these in the agendas and minutes available on the SRN website as usual.

Summary of content:

  • Preamble
  • Legal framework
  • Options assessed
  • “Frustration” due to force majeure
  • Recommendation and resolution (in detail)

Note: all extracts from SRN Constitution in blue preceded by article/clause number. Emphasis in bold not in original text. The full text of the SRN Constitution is available on the SRN website.

PREAMBLE

The SRN is an unincorporated association. There is no legal requirement per se for unincorporated organisations to hold an AGM: it is therefore up to the governing document of the association to determine whether an AGM is in fact required. The SRN Constitution states this clearly:

7.1. There shall be a General Meeting of the membership held annually. This will be called by the Executive Council, which will give two months’ notice of the date and location of the AGM.

Had we been able to run the Oxford SRN2020 Conference in September 2020 as per original plan, the Executive Council would have issued notice of the next AGM to be held during the Conference by no later than early July 2020. The business and proceedings to be considered by the AGM are specified in the Constitution, in accordance to underlying legislation and customary practice, and include (but are not limited to): issues regarding membership (4.3 to 4.6), chairing role (7.2), the Executive Council reporting to members on the activities and achievement of the previous year (7.3), proper account of the views of members (7.5), any proposed changes to the Constitution (7.5 and 10.2) and, importantly, elect new members of the Executive Council (5.9).

5.9. Elections to the Executive Council will be conducted by secret ballot, by means appropriate to an international Association (e.g. by postal ballot with proof of membership, added to votes received at an AGM etc.).

Since the adoption of the Constitution in 2012, all AGMs have been held during the Annual Conference as it is the only occasion throughout the year to ensure the largest possible attendance in presentia by members coming from so many different countries. If we cannot hold the AGM and deliberate on the above issues as per usual, what happens in the absence of those decisions should depend once again on the terms of the Constitution. It is worth remembering that governing documents are legal documents. Unfortunately, the SRN Constitution does not cater for how a decision can/should be made re: the impossibility of holding a physical AGM and related elections of members of the Executive Council under extraordinary circumstances such as the current    COVID-19 crisis.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

As with any other similar organization, the responsibility for proper governance of the SRN rests with its trustee body (i.e. the Executive Council), including any risk assessment, particularly in setting the parameters of the process and reviewing and considering the results as a matter of good practice. While we have to acknowledge that due to the current situation we find ourselves unable to abide by the Constitution in relation to the matter of the AGM, we also need to consider that this could put us in breach of the rules re: the Executive Council elections. The potential risks of this scenario for the SRN would concern its governance (e.g. ensuring appropriate organizational structure, avoiding potential conflicts of interest, etc.) and its external and internal public perception (e.g. reputation within academia, members’ trust, not following government policy, etc.).

The Executive Council has considered these thoroughly and although it estimates the potential impact to be low, this resolution aims at addressing and minimizing these risks.

The SRN is an international association with members residing and working in more than 50 countries. Nonetheless, it is important to stress that the SRN Constitution:

10.1. […] is subject to the laws of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

As expected from a trustee body, the Executive Council has taken reasonable steps to identify the legal framework/requirements by reading relevant guidance and seeking appropriate advice where available pro bono. To this purpose, the Executive Council consulted the following trusted sources:

  • C19-related briefs and measures introduced by the UK Government
  • Relevant guidance issued by:
    • the ICSA (i.e. the Chartered Governance Institute in the UK)
    • the Charity Commission for England and Wales
    • the NCVO (National Council for Voluntary Organizations)
    • the Association of Chairs
    • the Small Charities Coalition
  • Information, legal help and guidance briefs available pro bono via the websites of the following organizations/law firms:
    • Bates Wells
    • Russell-Cooke
    • Slaughter & May
    • Net Lawman
    • Charity Governance Code

In the United Kingdom, the SRN is considered an unincorporated association – i.e. a “private concern” with no legal entity/personality and not separate from its members. There is no statutory definition of an unincorporated association: rather, it is governed by common law (i.e. custom and judicial precedent) and its legal basis is the general law of contract governing the agreements its members make with each other – in short, our written Constitution one subscribes to upon becoming a member.

The uncertainties that arise out of the absence of recognition of unincorporated associations as legal entities are well recognised. Even during the current emergency, the entirety of government/ ministerial/legal guidance issued in regard to AGMs and related concerns focuses on incorporated companies and charities and contain no mention whatsoever of unincorporated associations.

That said, member-interest associations such as the SRN share with charities the common characteristics of having non-profit-making objectives; adopting analogous good governance instruments (i.e. AGMs, trustee body); and (compared to some types of charities) not being incorporated – the main differences being the wider, voting membership and elected (rather than appointed) trustees of associations. As a result, common law and legal guidance available tend to imply that in case of similar concerns (e.g. AGMs) they may apply to unincorporated associations as well.

On the other hand, since the SRN does not carry out trading, business or commercial activities, have employees, run profits, pay taxes or own properties, it has the advantage of not having a legal requirement to be audited or to report to any authority other than its members (e.g. to the Charity Commission, the Companies House or the Financial Services Authority).

OPTIONS ASSESSED

As the Charity Commission[1] noted recently, under current government restrictions charities (just like other organizations) will have no choice but to cancel or rearrange (e.g. postpone) face-to-face meetings, including AGMs. Further to this, the ICSA has issued government-reviewed guidance in consultation with regulatory bodies and law firms: although these are addressed primarily to companies and other incorporated entities, the advice provided with regards to AGMs in particular reiterates the Charity Commission’s suggestion for organizations to consider their own individual circumstances, including their articles of association. In short, whatever approach is taken, the indication that emerges clearly is: “It’s your decision”. (CC27).

Below we assess various options that have been suggested with regards to AGMs.

Options unavailable (i.e. adjourn, postpone)

Adjourning the AGM or postponing its scheduled date are viable options only once the notice of the AGM has already been issued and if permitted under the articles of associations. As of this document’s date, such notice has not been issued and provisions for these are not present in the SRN Constitution.

Delaying the AGM and elections

If notice of the AGM has not been issued yet, it is possible to delay it. In fact, this option only grants a “stay of execution”: put simply, a temporary suspension of the AGM for a maximum of, normally, six (6) months from the reference year-end. Assuming this to be the end of the academic year in the UK, this would enable us to delay the AGM until the end of February 2021. In short, we would delay but not resolve the issue at hand, with the added complication of then having to host two AGMs in one year.

Virtual/Hybrid AGM and elections

UK common law provides legal authority that general meetings require the participants to be able to “both see and hear each other”; therefore, meetings conducted and attended from remote via electronic means should be permissible unless the governing document states otherwise. On the other hand, LawWorks remains cautious, advising that unless the Constitution includes specific provision permitting remote formal AGMs (as opposed to routine meetings such as the monthly ones of the Executive Council), the legal position on whether these are indeed valid is unclear.

Generally, virtual-only AGMs are not valid meetings. The usual alternative to these is hybrid meetings – i.e. the Chair and other members hosting from the physical location of the meeting, the members attending from remote. We could assume that current circumstances (as well as the international nature of our membership) are such that, since hybrid is not an available option a priori, the only way to circumvent them is by hosting a virtual-only AGM.

The SRN Constitution neither mentions the possibility of hosting a virtual AGM (e.g. via remote means such as teleconferencing apps) nor does it prohibit it expressly. However, it does say that the notice should include the “location of the AGM” (7.1), which implies a face-to-face, physical meeting to be held at a given place – i.e. a meeting from remote cannot be validly held. Even assuming that Article 5.9 of the Constitution mentioned above offers leeway for broader interpretation in that using teleconferencing facilities could be interpreted as “means appropriate for an international association”, a number of criticalities remain, especially concerning the matter of the elections.

  • Although it is understood that not all members will decide to attend the AGM (even from remote), good practice dictates that all members should be able to, should they wish to do so. It is practically impossible to ensure this.
  • Any meeting via video-conferencing means remains exposed to technical risks (e.g. poor or lost connections) that jeopardize the validity of the proceedings.
  • At the moment, the most commonly used free video-conferencing solutions available are:
    • Google Hangouts Meets allows up to 250 participants per call and no time limit. But currently, it is free only until 1 July 2020;
    • Zoom allows up to 100 participants for max 40 minutes. But it has been shown to be severely plagued by a number of serious security and privacy issues that have been shown likely to be in breach of General Data Protection Regulation;
    • Skype has no time limit, but is limited to 50 users.

Even assuming that any of the above enabled us to host a valid AGM, on the matter of the elections none of them offers a fail-proof solution that guarantees a “secret ballot” while live (as required by the SRN Constitution, 5.9).

  • The requirement of a “secret ballot” also excludes the possibility of voting by proxy.

Changing the Constitution

A resolution to amend the Constitution could be proposed in order to address the vulnus at hand. This can be actioned by issuing a Call to Membership outlining such resolution but will still be highly impractical because members’ views on the proposal could only be debated from remote. Furthermore:

10.2. […] the Constitution may be altered by a resolution passed by not less than two thirds of Association members of at least one year’s standing.

Therefore, such majority would have to be calculated based on the totality of the SRN membership as opposed to a simple quorum of voters – at present, eligible members would be around 560 with a required majority estimated to be around 375 members. Even assuming that we could achieve such majority by “silent assent” we must remember that this would not be a minor amendment; on the contrary, one with significant ramifications for the ordinary governance of the SRN and therefore the process would not be devoid of risks (e.g. lack of clarity, inability to ensure comprehensive participation, etc.). In view of the above, the recommendation of the Executive Council on this matter is that such changes to the Constitution should be more properly debated at an actual AGM.

“FRUSTRATION” DUE TO FORCE MAJEURE

Given all the above; and although the SRN Constitution does not include an article re: force majeure; it seems clear that under the current, unforeseeable circumstances that have dragged everyone’s life and work away from familiar routines and customs, the common law principle of “frustration” applies and forces us to make tough but necessary decisions and look for alternative arrangements.

We, the Executive Council, acknowledge our role as agent for all the members in accordance with the SRN Constitution.

6.1. The Executive Council is the servant of the Association, and shall act in accordance with the wishes of the Association.

6.2. The Executive Council shall decide policy and strategy, and make decisions for and on behalf of the Association, in accordance with the wishes of the Association.

After much discussion and deliberation, the Executive Council has approved unanimously the resolution outlined below. However:

6.3. The Executive Council has a duty to consult the membership over matters deemed by the Council as significant for the wellbeing of the Association.

Therefore, before making a final ratification, the Executive Council issues the present Call to Membership with the following:

RECOMMENDATION AND RESOLUTION (IN DETAIL)

In order to ensure that the views of members are taken into due account in the decision-making process, we call to all members to express their preference between the options outlined below.

Option 1 (recommended by the Executive Council)

  1. Both AGM and elections to be delayed to September 2021 to be held in presentia during the Oxford Conference.
  2. The mandate of current members of the Executive Council to be extended automatically by one year. More precisely:
    • Margaret McVeigh and Paolo Russo (until September 2021)
    • Rose Ferrell, Rafael Leal and Rosanne Welch (until September 2022)

Note: Carmen Sofia Brenes has notified the Executive Council of her intention to stand down in September 2020 anyway. In accordance with the Constitution, the Executive Council will still consist of the required minimum number of five members in post (5.1) to be valid and fully operative and therefore there is no need to replace Prof Brenes for just one year.

  1. The next elections to be held in September 2021 will resume with the usual rota system (three members to be renewed every year).
  2. The present decision does not concern the appointment of the Early Career Researchers representative (currently Alexandra Ksenofontova), who is inducted by the Executive Council (i.e. not elected). A call for the renewal of this role (from September 2020 to September 2021) will be issued in June/July 2020.
  3. The Executive Council will still publish its Annual Report (for 2019/20) and Action Plan (for 2020/21) via the SRN mailing list and website in September 2020. Suggestions from Members for items to be included in the Action Plan are most welcome.
  4. Resolution(s) to address the issues expounded above will be proposed and properly discussed and voted at the AGM during the Annual Conference in September 2021, so as to give the SRN the appropriate time and instruments to tackle similar situations in the future, if any.

Option 2

  1. AGM only to be delayed (de facto, adjourned) to September 2021.
  2. Mandate of current members of the Executive Council not to be extended.
  3. Call for Nominations to be posted in July 2020, as per usual.
  4. Election of three new members to be held from remote via Google Survey in September 2020.

Note: while a virtual vote held by electronic means (e.g. Google Survey) would meet the requirement of a “secret ballot” it would still be in breach of the Constitution as the elections would be conducted entirely outside of an AGM. Members’ overall preference for this option will be considered as democratic consensus to bypass this under the circumstances (also see below). However, the Executive Council does not recommend it because, should the validity of this option be questioned after the elections took place, there is a risk of not having a valid Executive Council in post until at least the next AGM can actually take place and address the issue (including by amending the Constitution).

*  *  *  *  *

Members can express their preference for one of the two options above by clicking HERE by no later than Thursday 19 June, 3 pm (UK time/UTC+1).

The Executive Council will check the result and ratification of the decision will be the top-priority item in the agenda of the next monthly meeting scheduled on Monday 22 June 2020. The final decision will be notified to the Membership shortly afterwards.

Regardless of the preference expressed by members, it is important to stress that this is a one-off, exceptional executive decision made exclusively with the aim of bypassing the lack of a specific provision in the Constitution, but in accordance with current law provision and guidance, in order to tackle the current COVID-19 crisis. Consider, by way of comparison, that in the UK the administrative elections that were due to be held in May 2020 have similarly been postponed by one year, de facto extending the mandate of those who were due to stand down this year.

This resolution assumes that the emergency will have subsided by 2021 and that the planned Oxford Conference can be run safely. Should the emergency continue, worst scenarios will be considered by the Executive Council in the new academic year. Given the longer time and, hopefully, more information available, the Executive Council will make sure to consult the Membership and, in case the need for any further significant resolutions arise, we might eventually decide to actually issue a call for a Special General Meeting (from remote).

The Executive Council appreciates that these is a difficult decision and welcomes any thoughts, concerns or suggestions on the matter. Please do get in touch with me if you wish to discuss any of the above in person.

Paolo Russo

SRN Acting Chairperson

on behalf of the SRN Executive Council

[1] The Charity Commission is a non-ministerial department of the UK Government.

%d bloggers like this: